language-agnostic nlp code-golf rosetta-stone

language agnostic - Código Golf: Número de palabras



language-agnostic nlp (22)

Las series de golf de código parecen ser bastante populares. Me encontré con un código que convierte un número en su representación de palabras. Algunos ejemplos serían (poderes de 2 para la diversión de programación):

  • 2 -> Dos
  • 1024 -> Mil mil veinticuatro
  • 1048576 -> Un Millon Cuarenta Y Ocho Mil Quinientos Setenta Y Seis

El algoritmo al que se acercó mi compañero de trabajo tenía casi doscientas líneas de longitud. Parece que habría una forma más concisa de hacerlo.

Pautas actuales:

  • Se aceptan presentaciones en cualquier lenguaje de programación (pido disculpas a PhiLho por la falta de claridad inicial sobre este)
  • Entrada máxima de 2 ^ 64 (consulte el siguiente enlace para las palabras, gracias mmeyers)
  • Escala corta con salida en inglés preferida, pero cualquier algoritmo es bienvenido. Solo comenta junto con el lenguaje de programación en cuanto al método utilizado.

Perl 5.10

my %expo=(0,'''', qw''1 thousand 2 million 3 billion 4 trillion 5 quadrillion 6 quintillion 7 sextillion 8 septillion 9 octillion 10 nonillion 11 decillion 12 undecillion 13 duodecillion 14 tredecillion 15 quattuordecillion 16 quindecillion 17 sexdecillion 18 septendecillion 19 octodecillion 20 novemdecillion 21 vigintillion'' ); my %digit=(0,'''', qw''1 one 2 two 3 three 4 four 5 five 6 six 7 seven 8 eight 9 nine 10 ten 11 eleven 12 twelve 13 thirteen 14 fourteen 15 fifteen 16 sixteen 17 seventeen 18 eighteen 19 nineteen 2* twenty 3* thirty 4* forty 5* fifty 6* sixty 7* seventy 8* eighty 9* ninety'' ); sub spell_number(_){ local($_)=@_; ($_,@_)=split/(?=(?:.{3})*+$)/; $_=0 x(3-length).$_; unshift@_,$_; my @o; my $c=@_; for(@_){ my $o=''''; /(.)(.)(.)/; $o.=$1?$digit{$1}.'' hundred'':''''; $o.=$2==1? '' ''.$digit{$2.$3} : ($2?'' ''.$digit{"$2*"}:''''). ($2&&$3?'' '':''''). $digit{$3} ; $o.=--$c?($o?'' ''.$expo{$c}.'', '':''''):''''; push@o,$o; } my $o; $o.=$_ for@o; $o=~/^/s*+(.*?)(, )?$/; $o?$1:''zero''; }

Notas:

  • This almost works on earlier Perls, it''s that first split() that seems to be the main problem. As it sits now the strings take up the bulk of the characters.
  • I could have shortened it, by removing the my ''s, and the local , as well as putting it all on one line.
  • I used Number::Spell as a starting point.
  • Works under strict and warnings .

Perl & CPAN working together:

#!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings; use Lingua::EN::Numbers qw(num2en); print num2en($_), "/n" for 2, 1024, 1024*1024;

C:/Temp> n.pl two one thousand and twenty-four one million, forty-eight thousand, five hundred and seventy-six


Aquí hay una implementación relativamente sencilla en C (52 líneas).

NOTA : esto no realiza ninguna comprobación de límites; la persona que llama debe asegurarse de que el búfer de llamadas sea lo suficientemente grande.

#include <stdio.h> #include <string.h> const char *zero_to_nineteen[20] = {"", "One ", "Two ", "Three ", "Four ", "Five ", "Six ", "Seven ", "Eight ", "Nine ", "Ten ", "Eleven ", "Twelve ", "Thirteen ", "Fourteen ", "Fifteen ", "Sixteen ", "Seventeen ", "Eighteen ", "Nineteen "}; const char *twenty_to_ninety[8] = {"Twenty ", "Thirty ", "Forty ", "Fifty ", "Sixty ", "Seventy ", "Eighty ", "Ninety "}; const char *big_numbers[7] = {"", "Thousand ", "Million ", "Billion ", "Trillion ", "Quadrillion ", "Quintillion "}; void num_to_word(char *buf, unsigned long long num) { unsigned long long power_of_1000 = 1000000000000000000ull; int power_index = 6; if(num == 0) { strcpy(buf, "Zero"); return; } buf[0] = 0; while(power_of_1000 > 0) { int group = num / power_of_1000; if(group >= 100) { strcat(buf, zero_to_nineteen[group / 100]); strcat(buf, "Hundred "); group %= 100; } if(group >= 20) { strcat(buf, twenty_to_ninety[group / 10 - 2]); group %= 10; } if(group > 0) strcat(buf, zero_to_nineteen[group]); if(num >= power_of_1000) strcat(buf, big_numbers[power_index]); num %= power_of_1000; power_of_1000 /= 1000; power_index--; } buf[strlen(buf) - 1] = 0; }

Y aquí hay una versión mucho más ofuscada de eso (682 caracteres). Probablemente podría reducirse un poco más si realmente lo intentara.

#include <string.h> #define C strcat(b, #define U unsigned long long char*z[]={"","One","Two","Three","Four","Five","Six","Seven","Eight","Nine","Ten","Eleven","Twelve","Thirteen","Fourteen","Fifteen","Sixteen","Seventeen","Eighteen","Nineteen"},*t[]={"Twenty ","Thirty ","Forty ","Fifty ","Sixty ","Seventy ","Eighty ","Ninety "},*q[]={"","Thousand ","Million ","Billion ","Trillion ","Quadrillion ","Quintillion "}; void W(char*b,U n){U p=1000000000000000000ull;int i=6;*b=0;if(!n)strcpy(b,"Zero ");else while(p){int g=n/p;if(g>99){C z[g/100]);C " ");C "Hundred ");g%=100;}if(g>19){C t[g/10-2]);g%=10;}if(g)C z[g]),C " ");if(n>=p)C q[i]);n%=p;p/=1000;i--;}b[strlen(b)-1]=0;}


Bien, creo que es hora de mi propia implementación en el script BATCH de Windows (debería funcionar en Windows 2000 o posterior).

Aquí está el código:

@echo off set zero_to_nineteen=Zero One Two Three Four Five Six Seven Eight Nine Ten Eleven Twelve Thirteen Fourteen Fifteen Sixteen Seventeen Eighteen Nineteen set twenty_to_ninety=ignore ignore Twenty Thirty Forty Fifty Sixty Seventy Eighty Ninety set big_numbers=ignore Thousand Million Billion Trillion Quadrillion Quintillion Sextillion Septillion Octillion Nonillion Decillion Undecillion Duodecillion Tredecillion Quattuordecillion Quindecillion Sexdecillion Septendecillion Octodecillion Novemdecillion Vigintillion rem 10^0 10^3 10^6 10^9 10^12 10^15 10^18 10^21 10^24 10^27 10^30 10^33 10^36 10^39 10^42 10^45 10^48 10^51 10^54 10^57 10^60 10^63 call :parse_numbers %* exit /B 0 :parse_numbers :parse_numbers_loop if "$%~1" == "$" goto parse_numbers_end call :parse_number %~1 echo %~1 -^> %parse_number_result% shift goto parse_numbers_loop :parse_numbers_end exit /B 0 :parse_number call :get_sign %~1 set number_sign=%get_sign_result% call :remove_groups %get_sign_result_number% call :trim_leading_zeros %remove_groups_result% set number=%trim_leading_zeros_result% if "$%number%" == "$0" ( set parse_number_result=Zero exit /B 0 ) set counter=0 set parse_number_result= :parse_number_loop set last_three=%number:~-3% set number=%number:~0,-3% call :parse_three %last_three% call :get_from %counter% %big_numbers% if "$%get_from_result%" == "$" ( set parse_number_result=* ERR: the number is too big! Even wikipedia doesn''t know how it''s called! exit /B 0 ) if not "$%parse_three_result%" == "$Zero" ( if %counter% == 0 ( set parse_number_result=%parse_three_result% ) else ( if not "$%parse_number_result%" == "$" ( set parse_number_result=%parse_three_result% %get_from_result% %parse_number_result% ) else ( set parse_number_result=%parse_three_result% %get_from_result% ) ) ) set /A counter+=1 if not "$%number%" == "$" goto parse_number_loop if "$%parse_number_result%" == "$" ( set parse_number_result=Zero exit /B 0 ) else if not "$%number_sign%" == "$" ( set parse_number_result=%number_sign% %parse_number_result% ) exit /B 0 :parse_three call :trim_leading_zeros %~1 set three=%trim_leading_zeros_result% set /A three=%three% %% 1000 set /A two=%three% %% 100 call :parse_two %two% set parse_three_result= set /A digit=%three% / 100 if not "$%digit%" == "$0" ( call :get_from %digit% %zero_to_nineteen% ) if not "$%digit%" == "$0" ( if not "$%get_from_result%" == "$Zero" ( set parse_three_result=%get_from_result% Hundred ) ) if "$%parse_two_result%" == "$Zero" ( if "$%parse_three_result%" == "$" ( set parse_three_result=Zero ) ) else ( if "$%parse_three_result%" == "$" ( set parse_three_result=%parse_two_result% ) else ( set parse_three_result=%parse_three_result% %parse_two_result% ) ) exit /B 0 :parse_two call :trim_leading_zeros %~1 set two=%trim_leading_zeros_result% set /A two=%two% %% 100 call :get_from %two% %zero_to_nineteen% if not "$%get_from_result%" == "$" ( set parse_two_result=%get_from_result% goto parse_two_20_end ) set /A digit=%two% %% 10 call :get_from %digit% %zero_to_nineteen% set parse_two_result=%get_from_result% set /A digit=%two% / 10 call :get_from %digit% %twenty_to_ninety% if not "$%parse_two_result%" == "$Zero" ( set parse_two_result=%get_from_result% %parse_two_result% ) else ( set parse_two_result=%get_from_result% ) goto parse_two_20_end :parse_two_20_end exit /B 0 :get_from call :trim_leading_zeros %~1 set idx=%trim_leading_zeros_result% set /A idx=0+%~1 shift :get_from_loop if "$%idx%" == "$0" goto get_from_loop_end set /A idx-=1 shift goto get_from_loop :get_from_loop_end set get_from_result=%~1 exit /B 0 :trim_leading_zeros set str=%~1 set trim_leading_zeros_result= :trim_leading_zeros_loop if not "$%str:~0,1%" == "$0" ( set trim_leading_zeros_result=%trim_leading_zeros_result%%str% exit /B 0 ) set str=%str:~1% if not "$%str%" == "$" goto trim_leading_zeros_loop if "$%trim_leading_zeros_result%" == "$" set trim_leading_zeros_result=0 exit /B 0 :get_sign set str=%~1 set sign=%str:~0,1% set get_sign_result= if "$%sign%" == "$-" ( set get_sign_result=Minus set get_sign_result_number=%str:~1% ) else if "$%sign%" == "$+" ( set get_sign_result_number=%str:~1% ) else ( set get_sign_result_number=%str% ) exit /B 0 :remove_groups set str=%~1 set remove_groups_result=%str:''=% exit /B 0

Este es el script de prueba que utilicé:

@echo off rem 10^x:x= 66 63 60 57 54 51 48 45 42 39 36 33 30 27 24 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0 call number 0 call number 2 call number -17 call number 30 call number 48 call number -256 call number 500 call number 874 call number 1''024 call number -17''001 call number 999''999 call number 1''048''576 call number -1''000''001''000''000 call number 912''345''014''587''957''003 call number -999''912''345''014''587''124''337''999''999 call number 111''222''333''444''555''666''777''888''999''000''000''000''001 call number -912''345''014''587''912''345''014''587''124''912''345''014''587''124''337 call number 999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999 call number 1''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000 rem 10^x:x= 66 63 60 57 54 51 48 45 42 39 36 33 30 27 24 21 18 15 12 9 6 3 0

Y esta es la salida que recibí de mi script de prueba:

0 -> Zero 2 -> Two -17 -> Minus Seventeen 30 -> Thirty 48 -> Forty Eight -256 -> Minus Two Hundred Fifty Six 500 -> Five Hundred 874 -> Eight Hundred Seventy Four 1''024 -> One Thousand Twenty Four -17''001 -> Minus Seventeen Thousand One 999''999 -> Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Nine 1''048''576 -> One Million Forty Eight Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Six -1''000''001''000''000 -> Minus One Trillion One Million 912''345''014''587''957''003 -> Nine Hundred Twelve Quadrillion Three Hundred Forty Five Trillion Fourteen Billion Five Hundred Eighty Seven Million Nine Hundred Fifty Seven Thousand Three -999''912''345''014''587''124''337''999''999 -> Minus Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Septillion Nine Hundred Twelve Sextillion Three Hundred Forty Five Quintillion Fourteen Quadrillion Five Hundred Eighty Seven Trillion One Hundred Twenty Four Billion Three Hundred Thirty Seven Million Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Nine 111''222''333''444''555''666''777''888''999''000''000''000''001 -> One Hundred Eleven Undecillion Two Hundred Twenty Two Decillion Three Hundred Thirty Three Nonillion Four Hundred Forty Four Octillion Five Hundred Fifty Five Septillion Six Hundred Sixty Six Sextillion Seven Hundred Seventy Seven Quintillion Eight Hundred Eighty Eight Quadrillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Trillion One -912''345''014''587''912''345''014''587''124''912''345''014''587''124''337 -> Minus Nine Hundred Twelve Tredecillion Three Hundred Forty Five Duodecillion Fourteen Undecillion Five Hundred Eighty Seven Decillion Nine Hundred Twelve Nonillion Three Hundred Forty Five Octillion Fourteen Septillion Five Hundred Eighty Seven Sextillion One Hundred Twenty Four Quintillion Nine Hundred Twelve Quadrillion Three Hundred Forty Five Trillion Fourteen Billion Five Hundred Eighty Seven Million One Hundred Twenty Four Thousand Three Hundred Thirty Seven 999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999''999 -> Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Vigintillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Novemdecillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Octodecillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Septendecillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Sexdecillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Quindecillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Quattuordecillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Tredecillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Duodecillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Undecillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Decillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Nonillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Octillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Septillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Sextillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Quintillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Quadrillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Trillion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Billion Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Million Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Nine 1''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000''000 -> * ERR: the number is too big! Even wikipedia doesn''t know how it''s called!

Si pudiera encontrar más nombres de números grandes , la secuencia de comandos admitiría números aún mayores. Actualmente, sin embargo, la secuencia de comandos funcionará con todos los números de - (10 ^ 66-1) a (10 ^ 66-1).

Debo mencionar que me divertí mucho resolviendo esto en BATCH. :)


C ++, 15 líneas:

#include <string> using namespace std; string Thousands[] = { "zero", "thousand", "million", "billion", "trillion", "quadrillion", "quintillion", "sexillion", "septillion", "octillion", "nonillion", "decillion" }; string Ones[] = { "zero", "one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight", "nine", "ten", "eleven", "twelve", "thirteen", "fourteen", "fifteen", "sixteen", "seventeen", "eighteen", "nineteen" }; string Tens[] = { "zero", "ten", "twenty", "thirty", "forty", "fifty", "sixty", "seventy", "eighty", "ninety" }; string concat(bool cond1, string first, bool cond2, string second) { return (cond1 ? first : "") + (cond1 && cond2 ? " " : "") + (cond2 ? second : ""); } string toStringBelowThousand(unsigned long long n) { return concat(n >= 100, Ones[n / 100] + " hundred", n % 100 != 0, (n % 100 < 20 ? Ones[n % 100] : Tens[(n % 100) / 10] + (n % 10 > 0 ? " " + Ones[n % 10] : ""))); } string toString(unsigned long long n, int push = 0) { return n == 0 ? "zero" : concat(n >= 1000, toString(n / 1000, push + 1), n % 1000 != 0, concat(true, toStringBelowThousand(n % 1000), push > 0, Thousands[push])); }

Uso:

cout << toString(51351); // => fifty one thousand three hundred fifty one


En A86 assember : se ensambla en un ejecutable .COM:

dd 0ba02c6bfh, 0b8bd10c1h, 0e808b512h, 0ea870100h, 08700e9e8h, 010273eah dd 0e0e8c2h, 06b51872h, 0c000ebe8h, 0b3c02e8h, 03368067dh, 0b2e901h dd 0baaa5004h, 0fd8110c1h, 0cd7c1630h, 0bf3031bbh, 0a0571000h, 0ec880080h dd 0c581c589h, 023c0081h, 0e7f087ch, 0823e38h, 027b00875h, 0e901d068h dd 0b6400080h, 04f6f603h, 080d08a1ch, 0b60f80c4h, 07f06c7f4h, 088303000h dd 0ac00813eh, 087ef828h, 0b00056e8h, 051e81dh, 0d83850adh, 0e7f157ch dd 0a74fc38h, 0262ce088h, 0e901a368h, 01d2c003bh, 0580036e8h, 0b7efc38h dd 0774d838h, 0f828e088h, 0800026e8h, 0127e1dfah, 0afd448ah, 0440afe44h dd 074f838ffh, 0e8c28a05h, 0cafe000fh, 0ab7cee39h, 05a2405c6h, 021cd09b4h dd 05e856c3h, 020b05e00h, 0c5bec3aah, 074c00a02h, 03c80460ah, 0fefa755bh dd 046f675c8h, 0745b3cach, 0f8ebaae8h, 0eec1d689h, 08a3c8a03h, 07e180cah dd 0cfd2c1feh, 0ebe8c342h, 0fed8d0ffh, 0c3f775cdh, 01e581e8fh, 0303c5ea8h dd 0df6f652ah, 078bde03ch, 05e027500h, 01ec1603ch, 07d40793dh, 0603c8080h dd 09f6f2838h, 040f17a3dh, 080f17a22h, 0403d7264h, 0793cdee1h, 0140740f1h dd 01e2f7d32h, 02f488948h, 0a7c43b05h, 0a257af9bh, 0be297b6ch, 04609e30ah dd 0b8f902abh, 07c21e13eh, 09a077d9eh, 054f82ab5h, 0fabe2af3h, 08a6534cdh dd 0d32b4c97h, 035c7c8ceh, 082bcc833h, 0f87f154fh, 0650ff7eah, 02f143fdfh dd 0a1fd687fh, 0c3e687fdh, 0c6d50fe0h, 075f13574h, 0898c335bh, 0e748ce85h dd 08769676fh, 0ad2cedd3h, 0928c77c7h, 077e2d18eh, 01a77e8f6h db 0bah, 01bh

Es un ejecutable de 454 bytes.

Aquí está el código (un poco más pequeño). Como A86 es un único ensamblador 8086, tuve que codificar manualmente las extensiones de 32 bits:

mov di,strings mov dx,tree_data * 8 + 1 mov bp,code_data * 8 l1: mov ch,8 call extract_bits xchg dx,bp call extract_bit xchg dx,bp jnc l2 add dx,ax l2: call extract_bit jc l3 mov ch,6 call extract_bits shr al,2 cmp al,11 push l27 jl get_string l25: add al,48+32 stosb l27: mov dx,tree_data * 8 + 1 l3: cmp bp,end_data * 8 jl l1 convert: mov bx,''01'' mov di,01000h push di mov al,[80h] mov ah,ch mov bp,ax add bp,81h cmp al,2 jl zero jg l90 cmp byte ptr [82h],bh jne l90 zero: mov al,39 push done get_string: mov si,strings-1 or al,al je l36 l35: inc si cmp byte ptr [si],'';''+32 jne l35 dec al jnz l35 l36: inc si l37: lodsb cmp al,'';''+32 je ret stosb jmp l37 l90: inc ax mov dh,3 div dh add al,28 mov dl,al add ah,80h db 0fh, 0b6h, 0f4h ; movzx si,ah mov word ptr [80h],''00'' l95: lodsb sub al,bh jle l100 call get_string2 mov al,29 call get_string2 l100: lodsw push ax cmp al,bl jl l150 jg l140 cmp ah,bh je l140 mov al,ah sub al,''0''-10 push l150 get_string2: push si call get_string pop si mov al,'' '' stosb ret l140: sub al,''0''-19 call get_string2 l150: pop ax cmp ah,bh jle l200 cmp al,bl je l200 mov al,ah sub al,bh call get_string2 l200: cmp dl,29 jle l300 mov al,[si-3] or al,[si-2] or al,[si-1] cmp al,bh je l300 mov al,dl call get_string2 l300: dec dl cmp si,bp jl l95 done: mov byte ptr [di],''$'' pop dx mov ah,9 int 21h int 20h l41: rcr al,1 dec ch jz ret extract_bits: push l41 extract_bit: mov si,dx shr si,3 mov bh,[si] mov cl,dl and cl,7 inc cl ror bh,cl inc dx ret tree_data: dw 01e8fh, 01e58h, 05ea8h, 0303ch, 0652ah, 0df6fh, 0e03ch, 078bdh dw 07500h, 05e02h, 0603ch, 01ec1h, 0793dh, 07d40h, 08080h, 0603ch dw 02838h, 09f6fh, 07a3dh, 040f1h, 07a22h, 080f1h, 07264h, 0403dh dw 0dee1h, 0793ch, 040f1h, 01407h, 07d32h, 01e2fh, 08948h db 048h code_data: dw 052fh, 0c43bh, 09ba7h, 057afh, 06ca2h, 0297bh, 0abeh, 09e3h dw 0ab46h, 0f902h, 03eb8h, 021e1h, 09e7ch, 077dh, 0b59ah, 0f82ah dw 0f354h, 0be2ah, 0cdfah, 06534h, 0978ah, 02b4ch, 0ced3h, 0c7c8h dw 03335h, 0bcc8h, 04f82h, 07f15h, 0eaf8h, 0ff7h, 0df65h, 0143fh dw 07f2fh, 0fd68h, 0fda1h, 0e687h, 0e0c3h, 0d50fh, 074c6h, 0f135h dw 05b75h, 08c33h, 08589h, 048ceh, 06fe7h, 06967h, 0d387h, 02cedh dw 0c7adh, 08c77h, 08e92h, 0e2d1h, 0f677h, 077e8h, 0ba1ah db 01bh end_data: strings:

El texto se almacena usando la codificación Huffman. La línea de comando se pasa como una cadena, por lo que convertirla es simple: divida la cadena en grupos de tres y analice cada grupo (cientos, decenas y unidades) después de cada uno con el multiplicador actual (millones, miles, etc.).


Es esto hacer trampa?

perl -MNumber::Spell -e ''print spell_number(2);''


Lisp, usando solo funciones estándar:

(format nil "~r" 1234) ==> "one thousand two hundred thirty-four"

Prima:

(format nil "~@r" 1234) ==> "MCCXXXIV"


Ok, aquí está F #, tratando de seguir siendo legible, a unos 830 bytes:

#light let thou=[|"";"thousand";"million";"billion";"trillion";"quadrillion";"quintillion"|] let ones=[|"";"one";"two";"three";"four";"five";"six";"seven";"eight";"nine";"ten";"eleven"; "twelve";"thirteen";"fourteen";"fifteen";"sixteen";"seventeen";"eighteen";"nineteen"|] let tens=[|"";"";"twenty";"thirty";"forty";"fifty";"sixty";"seventy";"eighty";"ninety"|] let (^-) x y = if y="" then x else x^"-"^y let (^+) x y = if y="" then x else x^" "^y let (^?) x y = if x="" then x else x^+y let (+^+) x y = if x="" then y else x^+y let Tiny n = if n < 20 then ones.[n] else tens.[n/10] ^- ones.[n%10] let Small n = (ones.[n/100] ^? "hundred") +^+ Tiny(n%100) let rec Big n t = if n = 0UL then "" else (Big (n/1000UL) (t+1)) +^+ (Small(n%1000UL|>int) ^? thou.[t]) let Convert n = if n = 0UL then "zero" else Big n 0

y aquí están las pruebas unitarias

let Show n = printfn "%20u -> /"%s/"" n (Convert n) let tinyTests = [0; 1; 10; 11; 19; 20; 21; 30; 99] |> List.map uint64 let smallTests = tinyTests @ (tinyTests |> List.map (fun n -> n + 200UL)) let MakeTests t1 t2 = List.map (fun n -> n * (pown 1000UL t1)) smallTests |> List.map_concat (fun n -> List.map (fun x -> x * (pown 1000UL t2) + n) smallTests) for n in smallTests do Show n for n in MakeTests 1 0 do Show n for n in MakeTests 5 2 do Show n Show 1000001000678000001UL Show 17999999999999999999UL


Paul Fischer y Darius: Ustedes tienen algunas ideas geniales, pero odio verlas implementadas de una manera tan excesivamente detallada. :) Es una broma, tu solución es increíble, pero exprimí 14 30 bytes más, quedándome dentro de 79 columnas y manteniendo la compatibilidad con Python 3.

Así que aquí está mi pitón de 416 bytes en 79 columnas: (gracias chicos, estoy parado sobre sus hombros)

w=lambda n:_(n,["","thousand "]+p("m b tr quadr quint","illion"))[:-1]or"zero" _=lambda n,S:n*"x"and _(n//M,S[1:])+(Z[n%M//C]+"hundred ")*(n%M//C>0)+(n%C>19 and p("twen thir fo"+R,"ty")[n%C//10-2]+Z[n%10]or Z[n%C])+S[0]*(n%M>0) p=lambda a,b="":[i+b+" "for i in a.split()] R="r fif six seven eigh nine" M=1000 C=100 Z=[""]+p("one two three four five%st nine ten eleven twelve"%R[5:20])+p( "thir fou"+R,"teen")

Y las pruebas:

if __name__ == "__main__": import sys assert(w(0)=="zero") assert(w(100)=="one hundred") assert(w(1000000)=="one million") assert(w(1024)=="one thousand twenty four") assert(w(1048576)=="one million forty eight thousand five hundred seventy six")


Python, 446 bytes. Todas las líneas debajo de 80 columnas, maldición. Esta es la solución de Paul Fisher con ajustes de codificación en casi todas las líneas, por debajo de su versión de 488 bytes; desde entonces ha exprimido varios bytes más, y concedo. Ve a votar por su respuesta!

g=lambda n:["zero"," ".join(w(n,0))][n>0] w=lambda n,l:w(n//m,l+1)+[e,z[n%m//100]+["hundred"]][n%m//100>0]+/ (p("twen thir fo"+r,"ty")[n%100//10-2]+z[n%10]if n%100>19 else z[n%100])+/ [e,k[l]][n%m>0]if n else e p=lambda a,b:[[i+b]for i in a.split()] e=[];r="r fif six seven eigh nine";m=1000 k=[e,["thousand"]]+p("m b tr quadr quint","illion") z=[e]+p("one two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve","")+/ p("thir fou"+r,"teen")

La historia se ha complicado. Empecé con el código no utilizado a continuación, que admite números negativos y verificación de rango, más guiones en algunos números para un mejor inglés:

>>> n2w(2**20) ''one million forty-eight thousand five hundred seventy-six'' def n2w(n): if n < 0: return ''minus '' + n2w(-n) if n < 10: return W(''zero one two three four five six seven eight nine'')[n] if n < 20: return W(''ten eleven twelve'', ''thir four fif six seven eigh nine'', ''teen'')[n-10] if n < 100: tens = W('''', ''twen thir for fif six seven eigh nine'', ''ty'')[n//10-2] return abut(tens, ''-'', n2w(n % 10)) if n < 1000: return combine(n, 100, ''hundred'') for i, word in enumerate(W(''thousand'', ''m b tr quadr quint'', ''illion'')): if n < 10**(3*(i+2)): return combine(n, 10**(3*(i+1)), word) assert False def W(b, s='''', suff=''''): return b.split() + [s1 + suff for s1 in s.split()] def combine(n, m, term): return abut(n2w(n // m) + '' '' + term, '' '', n2w(n % m)) def abut(w10, sep, w1): return w10 if w1 == ''zero'' else w10 + sep + w1

Luego lo comprimí en unos 540 bytes mediante ofuscación (nuevo para mí), y Paul Fisher encontró un algoritmo más corto (soltando los guiones) junto con algunos trucos de codificación de Python maravillosamente horribles. Robé los trucos de codificación para llegar al 508 (que aún no ganó). Intenté reiniciar con un nuevo algoritmo, que no pudo vencer a Fisher. Finalmente aquí está el ajuste de su código. ¡El respeto!

El código ofuscado se ha probado en comparación con el código de limpieza, que se verificó por observación en varios casos.


Una función T-SQL (SQL Server 2005), que incluye casos de prueba:

if exists (select 1 from sys.objects where object_id = object_id(N''dbo.fnGetNumberString'')) drop function fnGetNumberString go /* Tests: declare @tests table ( testValue bigint ) insert into @tests select -43213 union select -5 union select 0 union select 2 union select 15 union select 33 union select 100 union select 456 union select 1024 union select 10343 union select 12345678901234 union select -3434343434343 select testValue, dbo.fnGetNumberString(testValue) as textValue from @tests */ create function dbo.fnGetNumberString ( @value bigint ) returns nvarchar(1024) as begin if @value = 0 return ''zero'' -- lets me avoid special-casing this later declare @isNegative bit set @isNegative = 0 if @value < 0 select @isNegative = 1, @value = @value * -1 declare @groupNames table ( groupOrder int, groupName nvarchar(15) ) insert into @groupNames select 1, '''' union select 2, ''thousand'' union select 3, ''million'' union select 4, ''billion'' union select 5, ''trillion'' union select 6, ''quadrillion'' union select 7, ''quintillion'' union select 8, ''sextillion'' declare @digitNames table ( digit tinyint, digitName nvarchar(10) ) insert into @digitNames select 0, '''' union select 1, ''one'' union select 2, ''two'' union select 3, ''three'' union select 4, ''four'' union select 5, ''five'' union select 6, ''six'' union select 7, ''seven'' union select 8, ''eight'' union select 9, ''nine'' union select 10, ''ten'' union select 11, ''eleven'' union select 12, ''twelve'' union select 13, ''thirteen'' union select 14, ''fourteen'' union select 15, ''fifteen'' union select 16, ''sixteen'' union select 17, ''seventeen'' union select 18, ''eighteen'' union select 19, ''nineteen'' declare @tensGroups table ( digit tinyint, groupName nvarchar(10) ) insert into @tensGroups select 2, ''twenty'' union select 3, ''thirty'' union select 4, ''forty'' union select 5, ''fifty'' union select 6, ''sixty'' union select 7, ''seventy'' union select 8, ''eighty'' union select 9, ''ninety'' declare @groups table ( groupOrder int identity, groupValue int ) declare @convertedValue varchar(50) while @value > 0 begin insert into @groups (groupValue) select @value % 1000 set @value = @value / 1000 end declare @returnValue nvarchar(1024) set @returnValue = '''' if @isNegative = 1 set @returnValue = ''negative'' select @returnValue = @returnValue + case when len(h.digitName) > 0 then '' '' + h.digitName + '' hundred'' else '''' end + case when len(isnull(t.groupName, '''')) > 0 then '' '' + t.groupName + case when len(isnull(o.digitName, '''')) > 0 then ''-'' else '''' end + isnull(o.digitName, '''') else case when len(isnull(o.digitName, '''')) > 0 then '' '' + o.digitName else '''' end end + case when len(n.groupName) > 0 then '' '' + n.groupName else '''' end from @groups g join @groupNames n on n.groupOrder = g.groupOrder join @digitNames h on h.digit = (g.groupValue / 100) left join @tensGroups t on t.digit = ((g.groupValue % 100) / 10) left join @digitNames o on o.digit = case when (g.groupValue % 100) < 20 then g.groupValue % 100 else g.groupValue % 10 end order by g.groupOrder desc return @returnValue end go


Vea la mejor respuesta recursiva. Es mucho mejor.

Apoyos locos a Darius para inspirarse en este. Tu gran W (ahora mi p ) fue especialmente inteligente.

w=lambda n:["zero"," ".join(_(n,0))][n>0] _=lambda n,l:_(n//M,l+1)+[E,Z[n%M//C]+["hundred"]][n%M//C>0]+/ (p("twen thir fo"+R,"ty")[n%C//10-2]+Z[n%10]if n%C>19 else Z[n%C])+/ [E,([E,["thousand"]]+p("m b tr quadr quint","illion"))[l]][n%M>0]if n else E p=lambda a,b:[[i+b]for i in a.split()] E=[];R="r fif six seven eigh nine";M=1000;C=100 Z=[E]+p("one two three four five six seven eight nine ten eleven twelve","")+/ p("thir fou"+R,"teen")

Lo pruebo con esto:

if __name__ == "__main__": import sys print w(int(sys.argv[1])) assert(w(100)=="one hundred") assert(w(1000000)=="one million") assert(w(1024)=="one thousand twenty four") assert(w(1048576)=="one million forty eight thousand five hundred seventy six")

En este punto, se trata de una modificación de la solución actual de Darius, que a su vez es una modificación de la anterior, que fue inspirada por la suya, y dio algunas pistas de errores en los comentarios. También es un crimen contra Python.

A continuación, los spoilers, se rot13 para tu protección, porque la mitad de la diversión del golf es descubrir cómo. Recomiendo encarecidamente la extensión de Firefox mnenhy para decodificar esto (y otros esquemas de codificación simples) en línea.

Pbafgnagf (V eranzrq gurz guvf erivfvba gb ubcrshyyl znxr gurz pyrnere.)

  • R : Gur rzcgl frg.
  • E : Gung juvpu vf va pbzzba orgjrra pbhagvat va gur "grraf" ( e grra, svs grra, fvk grra ...) naq va gur graf ( e gl, svs gl, fvk gl ....)
  • Z , P : Jung gurl ner va Ebzna ahzrenyf.
  • M : Nyy gur ahzoref sebz bar gb gjragl.

Shapgvbaf (fbzr nyfb eranzrq guvf ebhaq)

  • j : Gur choyvp-snpvat shapgvba, juvpu gheaf n ahzore vagb jbeqf.
  • _ : Erphefviryl gheaf gur ahzore vagb jbeqf, gubhfnaq-ol-gubhfnaq. a vf gur ahzore, y vf ubj sne guebhtu gur cbjref bs 1000 jr ner. Ergheaf n yvfg bs fvatyrgba yvfgf bs rnpu jbeq va gur ahzore, rt [[''bar''],[''gubhfnaq''],[''gjragl''],[''sbhe'']] .
  • c : sbe rnpu jbeq va gur fcnpr-frcnengrq jbeq yvfg n , nccraqf o nf n fhssvk naq chgf gurz rnpu vagb n fvatyrgba yvfg. Sbe rknzcyr, c("zo ge","vyyvba") == [[''zvyyvba''],[''ovyyvba''],[''gevyyvba'']] .

C # - 30 líneas incl. declaración de método y {} s :

Tiene en cuenta todas las comas, guiones y guiones antes mencionados. Solo he incluido hasta octillion porque decimal.MaxValue solo está en octillions. Para enteros más grandes necesitarías agregar elementos correspondientes a la matriz thou [] y quizás pasar el número como una cadena, modificando la línea para extraer el bloque usando los últimos 3 caracteres en lugar de usar módulo como lo hice aquí.

static string wordify(decimal v) { if (v == 0) return "zero"; var units = " one two three four five six seven eight nine".Split(); var teens = " eleven twelve thir# four# fif# six# seven# eigh# nine#".Replace("#", "teen").Split(); var tens = " ten twenty thirty forty fifty sixty seventy eighty ninety".Split(); var thou = " thousand m# b# tr# quadr# quint# sext# sept# oct#".Replace("#", "illion").Split(); var g = (v < 0) ? "minus " : ""; var w = ""; var p = 0; v = Math.Abs(v); while (v > 0) { int b = (int)(v % 1000); if (b > 0) { var h = (b / 100); var t = (b - h * 100) / 10; var u = (b - h * 100 - t * 10); var s = ((h > 0) ? units[h] + " hundred" + ((t > 0 | u > 0) ? " and " : "") : "") + ((t > 0) ? (t == 1 && u > 0) ? teens[u] : tens[t] + ((u > 0) ? "-" : "") : "") + ((t != 1) ? units[u] : ""); s = (((v > 1000) && (h == 0) && (p == 0)) ? " and " : (v > 1000) ? ", " : "") + s; w = s + " " + thou[p] + w; } v = v / 1000; p++; } return g + w; }

Llamado usando:

static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine(wordify(decimal.MaxValue)); }

Salida:

setenta y nueve octillones, doscientos veintiocho septillones, ciento sesenta y dos sextillones, quinientos catorce trillones, doscientos sesenta y cuatro cuatrillones, trescientos treinta y siete trillones, quinientos noventa y tres mil millones , quinientos cuarenta y tres millones, novecientos cincuenta mil, trescientos treinta y cinco


A few years ago I created this in C# for multi language applications.

This one is base class:

public abstract class ValueSource { public abstract object Value { get; } }

This one is for wordify..

public abstract class NumberTextValueSource:ValueSource { public abstract decimal Number { get; } public abstract string Format { get; } public abstract string Negative { get; } public abstract bool UseValueIfZero { get; } public abstract string N0 { get; } public abstract string N1 { get; } public abstract string N2 { get; } public abstract string N3 { get; } public abstract string N4 { get; } public abstract string N5 { get; } public abstract string N6 { get; } public abstract string N7 { get; } public abstract string N8 { get; } public abstract string N9 { get; } public abstract string N10 { get; } public abstract string N11 { get; } public abstract string N12 { get; } public abstract string N13 { get; } public abstract string N14 { get; } public abstract string N15 { get; } public abstract string N16 { get; } public abstract string N17 { get; } public abstract string N18 { get; } public abstract string N19 { get; } public abstract string N20 { get; } public abstract string N30 { get; } public abstract string N40 { get; } public abstract string N50 { get; } public abstract string N60 { get; } public abstract string N70 { get; } public abstract string N80 { get; } public abstract string N90 { get; } public abstract string N100 { get; } public abstract string NHundred { get; } public abstract string N1000 { get; } public abstract string NThousand { get; } public abstract string NMillion { get; } public abstract string NBillion { get; } public abstract string NTrillion { get; } public abstract string NQuadrillion { get; } string getOne(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'' && !UseValueIfZero) return ""; return (string)t.GetProperty("N" + v[0].ToString()).GetValue(this, null); } string getTwo(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') if (v[1] != ''0'') return getOne(t, v.Substring(1)); else return ""; if (v[1] == ''0'' || v[0] == ''1'') return (string)t.GetProperty("N" + v).GetValue(this, null); return (string)t.GetProperty("N" + v[0].ToString() + "0").GetValue(this, null) + getOne(t, v.Substring(1)); } string getThree(Type t, string v) { if(v[0] == ''0'') return getTwo(t,v.Substring(1)); if (v[0] == ''1'') return N100 + getTwo(t, v.Substring(1)); return getOne(t, v[0].ToString()) + NHundred + getTwo(t, v.Substring(1)); } string getFour(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getThree(t, v.Substring(1)); if (v[0] == ''1'') return N1000 + getThree(t, v.Substring(1)); return getOne(t, v[0].ToString()) + NThousand + getThree(t, v.Substring(1)); } string getFive(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getFour(t, v.Substring(1)); return getTwo(t, v.Substring(0, 2)) + NThousand + getThree(t, v.Substring(2)); } string getSix(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getFive(t, v.Substring(1)); return getThree(t, v.Substring(0, 3)) + NThousand + getThree(t, v.Substring(3)); } string getSeven(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getSix(t, v.Substring(1)); return getOne(t, v[0].ToString()) + NMillion + getSix(t, v.Substring(3)); } string getEight(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getSeven(t, v.Substring(1)); return getTwo(t, v.Substring(0, 2)) + NMillion + getSix(t, v.Substring(2)); } string getNine(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getEight(t, v.Substring(1)); return getThree(t, v.Substring(0, 3)) + NMillion + getSix(t, v.Substring(3)); } string getTen(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getNine(t, v.Substring(1)); return getOne(t, v.Substring(0, 1)) + NBillion + getNine(t, v.Substring(1)); } string getEleven(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getTen(t, v.Substring(1)); return getTwo(t, v.Substring(0, 2)) + NBillion + getNine(t, v.Substring(2)); } string getTwelve(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getEleven(t, v.Substring(1)); return getThree(t, v.Substring(0, 3)) + NBillion + getNine(t, v.Substring(3)); } string getThirteen(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getTwelve(t, v.Substring(1)); return getOne(t, v.Substring(0, 1)) + NTrillion + getTwelve(t, v.Substring(1)); } string getForteen(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getThirteen(t, v.Substring(1)); return getTwo(t, v.Substring(0, 2)) + NTrillion + getTwelve(t, v.Substring(2)); } string getFifteen(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getForteen(t, v.Substring(1)); return getThree(t, v.Substring(0, 3)) + NTrillion + getTwelve(t, v.Substring(3)); } string getSixteen(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getFifteen(t, v.Substring(1)); return getOne(t, v.Substring(0, 1)) + NQuadrillion + getFifteen(t, v.Substring(1)); } string getSeventeen(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getSixteen(t, v.Substring(1)); return getTwo(t, v.Substring(0, 2)) + NQuadrillion + getFifteen(t, v.Substring(2)); } string getEighteen(Type t, string v) { if (v[0] == ''0'') return getSeventeen(t, v.Substring(1)); return getThree(t, v.Substring(0, 3)) + NQuadrillion + getFifteen(t, v.Substring(3)); } string convert(Type t, string hp) { switch (hp.Length) { case 1: return getOne(t, hp); case 2: return getTwo(t, hp); case 3: return getThree(t, hp); case 4: return getFour(t, hp); case 5: return getFive(t, hp); case 6: return getSix(t, hp); case 7: return getSeven(t, hp); case 8: return getEight(t, hp); case 9: return getNine(t, hp); case 10: return getTen(t, hp); case 11: return getEleven(t, hp); case 12: return getTwelve(t, hp); case 13: return getThirteen(t, hp); case 14: return getForteen(t, hp); case 15: return getFifteen(t, hp); case 16: return getSixteen(t, hp); case 17: return getSeventeen(t, hp); case 18: return getEighteen(t, hp); } return ""; } public override object Value { get { decimal d = Number; decimal highPoint, lowPoint; bool isNeg = d < 0; d = Math.Abs(d); highPoint = Math.Floor(d); lowPoint = d - highPoint; Type t = this.GetType(); string strHigh = convert(t, highPoint.ToString()), strLow = lowPoint > 0 ? convert(t, lowPoint.ToString().Substring(2)) : UseValueIfZero ? N0 : ""; if (isNeg) strHigh = Negative + " " + strHigh; return string.Format(Format, strHigh, strLow); } } }

And this one is for Turkish Lera (TRY):

public class TRYNumberTextValueSource:NumberTextValueSource { decimal num; public TRYNumberTextValueSource(decimal value) { num = Math.Round(value, 2); } public override decimal Number { get { return num; } } public override string Format { get { if (num == 0) return N0 + " YTL"; if (num > -1 && num < 1) return "{0}{1} Kurus"; return "{0} YTL {1} Kurus"; } } public override string Negative { get { return "-"; } } public override bool UseValueIfZero { get { return false; } } public override string N0 { get { return "sifir"; } } public override string N1 { get { return "bir"; } } public override string N2 { get { return "iki"; } } public override string N3 { get { return "üç"; } } public override string N4 { get { return "dört"; } } public override string N5 { get { return "bes"; } } public override string N6 { get { return "alti"; } } public override string N7 { get { return "yedi"; } } public override string N8 { get { return "sekiz"; } } public override string N9 { get { return "dokuz"; } } public override string N10 { get { return "on"; } } public override string N11 { get { return "onbir"; } } public override string N12 { get { return "oniki"; } } public override string N13 { get { return "onüç"; } } public override string N14 { get { return "ondört"; } } public override string N15 { get { return "onbes"; } } public override string N16 { get { return "onalti"; } } public override string N17 { get { return "onyedi"; } } public override string N18 { get { return "onsekiz"; } } public override string N19 { get { return "ondokuz"; } } public override string N20 { get { return "yirmi"; } } public override string N30 { get { return "otuz"; } } public override string N40 { get { return "kirk"; } } public override string N50 { get { return "elli"; } } public override string N60 { get { return "altmis"; } } public override string N70 { get { return "yetmis"; } } public override string N80 { get { return "seksen"; } } public override string N90 { get { return "doksan"; } } public override string N100 { get { return "yüz"; } } public override string NHundred { get { return "yüz"; } } public override string N1000 { get { return "bin"; } } public override string NThousand { get { return "bin"; } } public override string NMillion { get { return "milyon"; } } public override string NBillion { get { return "milyar"; } } public override string NTrillion { get { return "trilyon"; } } public override string NQuadrillion { get { return "trilyar"; } } }

And it is used this way:

MessageBox.show((string)(new TRYNumberTextValueSource(12345)).Value);


Does anyone plan on adding the appropriate commas and ''and'' any time soon? Or hyphenating twenty-one through ninety-nine? Not much point otherwise, IMHO :)

''Nine Hundred Ninety Nine Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Nine''

vs

''Nine hundred and ninety-nine thousand, nine hundred and ninety-nine''

(And no, mine doesn''t work. Yet.)


Here''s a Scala solution. I''m not happy about trying to make it look short -- I sacrificed a bit of readability :(

object NumSpeller { val digits = Array("","one","two","three","four","five","six","seven","eight","nine") val teens = Array("ten", "eleven", "twelve", "thirteen", "fourteen", "fifteen", "sixteen", "seventeen", "eighteen", "nineteen") val tens = Array("", "ten", "twenty", "thirty", "fourty", "fifty", "sixty", "seventy", "eighty", "ninety") val thousands = Array("", "thousand", "million", "billion", "trillion", "quadrillion", "quintillion") def spellGroup(num:Int) = { val (v3, v2, v1) = ((num / 100) % 10, (num / 10) % 10, num % 10) val hs = v3 match { case 0 => ""; case d => digits(d) + " hundred " } val ts = v2 match { case 0 => digits(v1) case 1 => teens(v1) case _ => v3 match { case 0 => tens(v2); case _ => tens(v2) + "-" + digits(v1) } } hs + ts } def numberGroups(num:Long) = { def _numberGroups(num:Long, factor:Int):List[(Double,Int)] = factor match { case 0 => List((num % 1000,0)) case _ => ((num / Math.pow(1000, factor)) % 1000, factor) :: _numberGroups(num, factor - 1) } val ints = _numberGroups(num, 6) map (x => (x._1.asInstanceOf[Int],x._2)) ints dropWhile (x => x._1 == 0.0) } def spell(num:Long) = num match { case 0 => "zero"; case _ => (numberGroups(num) map { x => spellGroup(x._1) + " " + thousands(x._2) + " " }).mkString.trim } }

El uso es:

NumSpeller.spell(458582)


Here''s one in PHP, from Convert Numbers to Words :

convert_number(2850)

devoluciones

Two Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty

and if you want an even more awesome one that handles commas and numbers up to vigintillion check out zac hesters work at Language Display Functions :

function convert_number($number) { if (($number < 0) || ($number > 999999999)) { throw new Exception("Number is out of range"); } $Gn = floor($number / 1000000); /* Millions (giga) */ $number -= $Gn * 1000000; $kn = floor($number / 1000); /* Thousands (kilo) */ $number -= $kn * 1000; $Hn = floor($number / 100); /* Hundreds (hecto) */ $number -= $Hn * 100; $Dn = floor($number / 10); /* Tens (deca) */ $n = $number % 10; /* Ones */ $res = ""; if ($Gn) { $res .= convert_number($Gn) . " Million"; } if ($kn) { $res .= (empty($res) ? "" : " ") . convert_number($kn) . " Thousand"; } if ($Hn) { $res .= (empty($res) ? "" : " ") . convert_number($Hn) . " Hundred"; } $ones = array("", "One", "Two", "Three", "Four", "Five", "Six", "Seven", "Eight", "Nine", "Ten", "Eleven", "Twelve", "Thirteen", "Fourteen", "Fifteen", "Sixteen", "Seventeen", "Eightteen", "Nineteen"); $tens = array("", "", "Twenty", "Thirty", "Fourty", "Fifty", "Sixty", "Seventy", "Eigthy", "Ninety"); if ($Dn || $n) { if (!empty($res)) { $res .= " and "; } if ($Dn < 2) { $res .= $ones[$Dn * 10 + $n]; } else { $res .= $tens[$Dn]; if ($n) { $res .= "-" . $ones[$n]; } } } if (empty($res)) { $res = "zero"; } return $res; }


I can''t find the file now, but this was an Intro to Programming problem (late in the term) where I went to school. We had to be able to turn a float into a valid written number for use on a check.

After the assignment was completed the professor showed some C++ code that solved the problem using only concepts we''d already covered. It ran just 43 lines, and was well-documented.


In the D programming language

string Number(ulong i) { static string[] names = [ ""[], " thousand", " million", " billion", " trillion", " quadrillion", ]; string ret = null; foreach(mult; names) { if(i%1000 != 0) { if(ret != null) ret = ret ~ ", " ret = Cent(i%1000) ~ mult ~ ret; } i /= 1000; } return ret; } string Cent(int i) { static string[] v = [""[], "one", "two", "three", "four", "five", "six", "seven", "eight", "nine"]; static string[] tens = ["!"[], "!", "twenty", "thirty", "forty", "fifty", "sixty", "seventy", "eighty", "ninety"]; string p1, p2, p3 = ""; if(i >= 100) { p1 = v[i/100] ~ " hundred"; p3 = (i % 100 != 0) ? " and " : ""; //optional } else p1 = ""; i %= 100; switch(i) { case 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9: p2 = v[i]; break; case 10: p2 = "ten"; break; case 11: p2 = "eleven"; break; case 12: p2 = "twelve"; break; case 13: p2 = "thirteen"; break; case 14: p2 = "fourteen"; break; case 15: p2 = "fifteen"; break; case 16: p2 = "sixteen"; break; case 17: p2 = "seventeen"; break; case 18: p2 = "eighteen"; break; case 19: p2 = "nineteen"; break; default: p2 = tens[i/10] ~ "-" ~ v[i%10]; break; } return p1 ~ p3 ~ p2; } import std.stdio; void main() { writef("%s/n", Number(8_000_400_213)); }

Try it out here


Mmm, you might have put the bar a bit high, both on the limit (18,446,744,073,709,552,000, I don''t even know how to write that!) and on the goal (the other code golfs resulted in short code, this one will be long at least for the data (words)).

Anyway, for the record, I give an well known solution (not mine!) for French, in PHP: Écriture des nombres en français . :-)

Note the ambiguity (voluntary or not) of your wording: " Submissions in any language welcome "
I first took it as "natural language", before understand you probably meant "programming language...
The algorithm is probably simpler in English (and with less regional variants...).


#!/usr/bin/env perl my %symbols = ( 1 => "One", 2 => "Two", 3 => "Three", 4 => "Four", 5 => "Five", 6 => "Six", 7 => "Seven", 8 => "Eight", 9 => "Nine", 10 => "Ten", 11 => "Eleven", 12 => "Twelve", 13 => "Thirteen", 14 => "Fourteen", 15 => "Fifteen", 16 => "Sixteen", 17 => "Seventeen", 18 => "Eighteen", 19 => "Nineteen", 20 => "Twenty", 30 => "Thirty", 40 => "Forty", 50 => "Fifty", 60 => "Sixty", 70 => "Seventy", 80 => "Eighty", 90 => "Ninety", 100 => "Hundred"); my %three_symbols = (1 => "Thousand", 2 => "Million", 3 => "Billion" ); sub babo { my ($input) = @_; my @threes = split(undef, $input); my $counter = ($#threes + 1); my $remainder = $counter % 3; my @result; while ($counter > 0){ my $digits = ""; my $three; my $full_match = 0; if ($remainder > 0){ while ($remainder > 0) { $digits .= shift(@threes); $remainder--; $counter--; } } else { $digits = join('''',@threes[0,1,2]); splice(@threes, 0, 3); $counter -= 3; } if (exists($symbols{$digits})){ $three = $symbols{$digits}; $full_match = 1; } elsif (length($digits) == 3) { $three = $symbols{substr($digits,0,1)}; $three .= " Hundred"; $digits = substr($digits,1,2); if (exists($symbols{$digits})){ $three .= " " . $symbols{$digits}; $full_match = 1; } } if ($full_match == 0){ $three .= " " . $symbols{substr($digits,0,1)."0"}; $three .= " " . $symbols{substr($digits,1,1)}; } push(@result, $three); if ($counter > 0){ push(@result, "Thousand"); } } my $three_counter = 0; my @r = map {$_ eq "Thousand" ? $three_symbols{++$three_counter}:$_ } reverse @result; return join(" ", reverse @r); } print babo(1) . "/n"; print babo(12) . "/n"; print babo(120) . "/n"; print babo(1234) . "/n"; print babo(12345) . "/n"; print babo(123456) . "/n"; print babo(1234567) . "/n"; print babo(1234567890) . "/n";