c# - una - lambda sintaxis

¿Cómo configuro un valor de campo en un árbol de expresiones C#?

Question

Dado:

FieldInfo field = <some valid string field on type T>;
ParameterExpression targetExp = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "target");
ParameterExpression valueExp = Expression.Parameter(typeof(string), "value");

¿Cómo compilo una expresión lambda para establecer el campo en el parámetro "objetivo" en "valor"?

Answer 1

En realidad, hay una manera de establecer propiedades y campos con Expression Trees en .NET 3.5. Puede ser la única opción para algunos perfiles de PCL que no admiten Delegate.CreateDelegate (además de Reflection.Emit ):

• Para el campo, el truco es pasar el campo como parámetro ref ,
  por ejemplo, SetField(ref holder.Field, "NewValue");

• La propiedad (como ya señaló Marc) puede establecerse al reflejar y llamar a su método setter.

La prueba completa de concepto se proporciona a continuación como dispositivo de prueba NUnit.

[TestFixture]
public class CanSetPropAndFieldWithExpressionTreeInNet35
{
    class Holder
    {
        public int Field;
        public string Prop { get; set; }
    }

    public static class FieldAndPropSetter
    {
        public static T SetField<T, TField>(T holder, ref TField field, TField value)
        {
            field = value;
            return holder;
        }

        public static T SetProp<T>(T holder, Action<T> setProp)
        {
            setProp(holder);
            return holder;
        }
    }

    [Test]
    public void Can_set_field_with_expression_tree_in_Net35()
    {
        // Shows how expression could look like:
        Func<Holder, Holder> setHolderField = h => FieldAndPropSetter.SetField(h, ref h.Field, 111);
        var holder = new Holder();
        holder = setHolderField(holder);
        Assert.AreEqual(111, holder.Field);

        var holderType = typeof(Holder);
        var field = holderType.GetField("Field");
        var fieldSetterMethod =
            typeof(FieldAndPropSetter).GetMethod("SetField")
            .MakeGenericMethod(holderType, field.FieldType);

        var holderParamExpr = Expression.Parameter(holderType, "h");
        var fieldAccessExpr = Expression.Field(holderParamExpr, field);

        // Result expression looks like: h => FieldAndPropSetter.SetField(h, ref h.Field, 222)
        var setHolderFieldExpr = Expression.Lambda<Func<Holder, Holder>>(
            Expression.Call(fieldSetterMethod, holderParamExpr, fieldAccessExpr, Expression.Constant(222)),
            holderParamExpr);

        var setHolderFieldGenerated = setHolderFieldExpr.Compile();
        holder = setHolderFieldGenerated(holder);
        Assert.AreEqual(222, holder.Field);
    }

    [Test]
    public void Can_set_property_with_expression_tree_in_Net35()
    {
        // Shows how expression could look like:
        Func<Holder, Holder> setHolderProp = h => FieldAndPropSetter.SetProp(h, _ => _.Prop = "ABC");
        var holder = new Holder();
        holder = setHolderProp(holder);
        Assert.AreEqual("ABC", holder.Prop);

        var holderType = typeof(Holder);
        var prop = holderType.GetProperty("Prop");
        var propSet = prop.GetSetMethod();

        var holderParamExpr = Expression.Parameter(holderType, "h");
        var callSetPropExpr = Expression.Call(holderParamExpr, propSet, Expression.Constant("XXX"));
        var setPropActionExpr = Expression.Lambda(callSetPropExpr, holderParamExpr);

        var propSetterMethod = typeof(FieldAndPropSetter).GetMethod("SetProp").MakeGenericMethod(holderType);

        // Result expression looks like: h => FieldAndPropSetter.SetProp(h, _ => _.Prop = "XXX")
        var setHolderPropExpr = Expression.Lambda<Func<Holder, Holder>>(
            Expression.Call(propSetterMethod, holderParamExpr, setPropActionExpr),
            holderParamExpr);

        var setHolderPropGenerated = setHolderPropExpr.Compile();
        holder = setHolderPropGenerated(holder);
        Assert.AreEqual("XXX", holder.Prop);
    }
}

Answer 2

Establecer un campo es, como ya se discutió, problemático. Puede (en 3.5) un único método, como un conjunto de propiedades, pero solo indirectamente. Esto se vuelve mucho más fácil en 4.0, como se discute here . Sin embargo, si tiene propiedades (no campos), puede hacer mucho simplemente con Delegate.CreateDelegate :

using System;
using System.Reflection;
public class Foo
{
    public int Bar { get; set; }
}
static class Program
{
    static void Main()
    {
        MethodInfo method = typeof(Foo).GetProperty("Bar").GetSetMethod();
        Action<Foo, int> setter = (Action<Foo, int>)
            Delegate.CreateDelegate(typeof(Action<Foo, int>), method);

        Foo foo = new Foo();
        setter(foo, 12);
        Console.WriteLine(foo.Bar);
    }
}

Answer 3

Para completar, aquí está el getter:

    public static IEnumerable<Func<T, object>> GetTypeGetters<T>()
    {
        var fields = typeof (T).GetFields();

        foreach (var field in fields)
        {
            ParameterExpression targetExp = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "target");
            UnaryExpression boxedFieldExp = Expression.Convert(Expression.Field(targetExp, field), typeof(object));
            yield return  Expression.Lambda<Func<T,object>>(boxedFieldExp, targetExp).Compile();
        }
    }

Answer 4

Una vez hice esta clase. Quizás esto ayude:

public class GetterSetter<EntityType,propType>
{
    private readonly Func<EntityType, propType> getter;
    private readonly Action<EntityType, propType> setter;
    private readonly string propertyName;
    private readonly Expression<Func<EntityType, propType>> propertyNameExpression;

    public EntityType Entity { get; set; }

    public GetterSetter(EntityType entity, Expression<Func<EntityType, propType>> property_NameExpression)
    {
        Entity = entity;
        propertyName = GetPropertyName(property_NameExpression);
        propertyNameExpression = property_NameExpression;
        //Create Getter
        getter = propertyNameExpression.Compile();
        // Create Setter()
        MethodInfo method = typeof (EntityType).GetProperty(propertyName).GetSetMethod();
        setter = (Action<EntityType, propType>)
                 Delegate.CreateDelegate(typeof(Action<EntityType, propType>), method);
    }


    public propType Value
    {
        get
        {
            return getter(Entity);
        }
        set
        {
            setter(Entity, value);
        }
    }

    protected string GetPropertyName(LambdaExpression _propertyNameExpression)
    {
        var lambda = _propertyNameExpression as LambdaExpression;
        MemberExpression memberExpression;
        if (lambda.Body is UnaryExpression)
        {
            var unaryExpression = lambda.Body as UnaryExpression;
            memberExpression = unaryExpression.Operand as MemberExpression;
        }
        else
        {
            memberExpression = lambda.Body as MemberExpression;
        }
        var propertyInfo = memberExpression.Member as PropertyInfo;
        return propertyInfo.Name;
    }

prueba:

var gs = new GetterSetter<OnOffElement,bool>(new OnOffElement(), item => item.IsOn);
        gs.Value = true;
        var result = gs.Value;

Answer 5

.Net 4.0 : ahora que hay Expression.Assign , esto es fácil de hacer:

FieldInfo field = typeof(T).GetField("fieldName");
ParameterExpression targetExp = Expression.Parameter(typeof(T), "target");
ParameterExpression valueExp = Expression.Parameter(typeof(string), "value");

// Expression.Property can be used here as well
MemberExpression fieldExp = Expression.Field(targetExp, field);
BinaryExpression assignExp = Expression.Assign(fieldExp, valueExp);

var setter = Expression.Lambda<Action<T, string>>
    (assignExp, targetExp, valueExp).Compile();

setter(subject, "new value");

.Net 3.5 : no puede, tendrá que usar System.Reflection.Emit en su lugar:

class Program
{
    class MyObject
    {
        public int MyField;
    }

    static Action<T,TValue> MakeSetter<T,TValue>(FieldInfo field)
    {
        DynamicMethod m = new DynamicMethod(
            "setter", typeof(void), new Type[] { typeof(T), typeof(TValue) }, typeof(Program));
        ILGenerator cg = m.GetILGenerator();

        // arg0.<field> = arg1
        cg.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
        cg.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_1);
        cg.Emit(OpCodes.Stfld, field);
        cg.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);

        return (Action<T,TValue>) m.CreateDelegate(typeof(Action<T,TValue>));
    }

    static void Main()
    {
        FieldInfo f = typeof(MyObject).GetField("MyField");

        Action<MyObject,int> setter = MakeSetter<MyObject,int>(f);

        var obj = new MyObject();
        obj.MyField = 10;

        setter(obj, 42);

        Console.WriteLine(obj.MyField);
        Console.ReadLine();
    }
}

Answer 6

private static Action<object, object> CreateSetAccessor(FieldInfo field)
    {
        DynamicMethod setMethod = new DynamicMethod(field.Name, typeof(void), new[] { typeof(object), typeof(object) });
        ILGenerator generator = setMethod.GetILGenerator();
        LocalBuilder local = generator.DeclareLocal(field.DeclaringType);
        generator.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_0);
        if (field.DeclaringType.IsValueType)
        {
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Unbox_Any, field.DeclaringType);
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Stloc_0, local);
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Ldloca_S, local);
        }
        else
        {
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Castclass, field.DeclaringType);
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Stloc_0, local);
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Ldloc_0, local);
        }
        generator.Emit(OpCodes.Ldarg_1);
        if (field.FieldType.IsValueType)
        {
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Unbox_Any, field.FieldType);
        }
        else
        {
            generator.Emit(OpCodes.Castclass, field.FieldType);
        }
        generator.Emit(OpCodes.Stfld, field);
        generator.Emit(OpCodes.Ret);
        return (Action<object, object>)setMethod.CreateDelegate(typeof(Action<object, object>));
    }